Column: Don’t Let Politicians Stop Amendment 4’s Clear Intent

Despite the package office success of superhero films and also the depth of some of their source material, the majority of films are noticed as shallow, mindless movies without having serious characterization. This assessment is not true. Superheroes could be complex characters with well-defined personalities, and the right actors and actresses can bring these personalities one's about the big screen. As five films demonstrate, playing roles that originate in comics doesn't diminish actors'credibility. They still grab the roles and characters seriously, even while confronting outlandish premises. In "Watchmen," Jackie Earle Haley acted sociopathic vigilante Walter Kovacs, also known as Rorschach. From the primary lines on the film, viewers get a clear glimpse of Rorschach's unhinged personality from his monologue in regards to the decaying morality of New York City and, by extension, all of those other world. Kovacs is inwardly tortured and angry at both himself and society, and then he of having he knows of to face this anger would be to hunt those he sees as criminals. The scene where he fully discards his civilian identity as Rorschach serves as one example: Haley makes Kovacs visibly shiver with anger at Blair Roche's brutal death as they exacts justice about the murderer. Another scene, where Kovacs is in prison after being apprehended, shows how contemptuous they are of criminals even as he is seemingly at their mercy.

When Amendment 4 passed with nearly 65 percent of the vote in Florida, it was a victory of people over politics. For decades, politicians promised to fix Florida’s broken felon disenfranchisement system. But partisan bickering left millions of Florida families struggling to navigate a broken system. The people responded to these challenges by putting Amendment 4 on the ballot and passing it with majority support in every Senate and House district across the state.

Since then, we have seen the opening chapter of the largest expansion of American democracy in 50 years. In every county of Florida, people from all walks of life and political backgrounds have registered to vote.

Unfortunately, this progress appears to be in jeopardy. Politicians in Tallahassee are formulating legislation that could potentially thwart the will of Florida’s voters, infringe on our Constitution and deny people the ability to be full participants in their own communities. For the millions of us who are impacted by Amendment 4, we will fight any measure that denies people their constitutional rights. We will do that now, we will do that in 2020, and we will do that beyond.

Few know how sacred the vote is like those of us who have lost it and fought to get it back. Because we know how disempowering it is to not have a voice in our community and how sacred getting that voice back is, we will fight against any politician who seeks to diminish or disregard the voice of voters.

In upcoming weeks, debates will begin about “protecting the system” and the legal definition of words. Inevitably, these conversations will occur through the prism of partisanship and short-term political advantage, namely the same forces that for decades held back the very changes Amendment 4 implemented. We will see politicians purport to engage in these conversations under the guise of trying to determine what the voters really wanted when they voted “yes” on Amendment 4. This will happen despite the fact that part of the constitutional initiative process included a review and unanimous support of Amendment 4’s language by the Florida Supreme Court, which meant it was in line with the many standards required to ensure that the language was clear and not confusing to voters.

We believe that when partisan politics and short-term advantage take over a debate, it is inevitably the people, all the people, who end up losing. For instance, Florida already has a standard in place for determining a person’s completion of sentence, as it relates to their ability to vote. This standard has been used for years, under both Democrat and Republican administrations, and is still being used today. Why change it now? Especially if that change results in fewer people being able to vote?

Inserting partisanship into the implementation process of Amendment 4 is dangerous for many reasons. Politicians picking their voters is wrong and offensive to the people who elect them, and, at the same time, a desire many politicians find hard to avoid. Left unchecked, a partisan approach to this debate will infect the entire session and soon see us stop talking about Amendment 4’s celebration of democracy, and instead result in focusing on the demonization of individual people with past convictions. Likewise, many of us have often heard politicians bemoan judges who “legislate from the bench,” yet somehow now we see some of those same leaders suggesting that it is the proper role of the Legislature to “interpret the constitution.” The reason Floridians from all walks of life worked together to collect more than 1 million signatures to get Amendment 4 on the ballot was because partisanship blocked our state lawmakers from doing what was right.

We believe the people deserve better than partisan legislation determining who can vote in our state. That is why we are encouraging our elected leaders to reconsider their decision to introduce Amendment 4 legislation. In our opinion, a better approach would be to simply follow the Constitution, let the departments who administer elections do their job, let the courts interpret the language and focus the legislative process on making sure that newly eligible voters are empowered to live up to their potential as fully engaged citizens of our state.

More than 5.1 million voters and 1.4 million newly enfranchised returning citizens will not appreciate politicians undermining the will of Floridians.

Desmond Meade is the executive director of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, and Neil Volz is the political director of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition.

In "The Mighty Thor," another superhero movie, Chris Hemsworth brings the Norse mythological god of thunder to life. Exiled from Asgard owing to his arrogance, Thor has got to regain Odin's favor and his or her own powers to handle trickster god Loki. Hemsworth portrays Thor's difficulty in acclamating yourself with Midgard/Earth within a diner scene: the Asgardian custom of slamming a mug for another person to indicate appreciation is humorous to the guests and in-character for Thor, yet it is off-putting for Jane Foster (played by Natalie Portman) and the other humans. Through this as well as other scenes, viewers observe how awkward Thor is and perceive his disoriented confusion, which ends up in violence after they have first landed on Earth. Thor attacks everyone within a rage, unable to simply accept that she has temporarily become fully human. Throughout the film, Thor grows more utilized to being among humans, an improvement that may be reflected as part of his holistic conversations with Jane Foster and Erik Selvig (Stellan Skarsgard). Inside the trilogy of films that is termed for him, the half-breed vampire hunter Blade represents another type of a well-played comic hero. Acted by Wesley Snipes, this character is gritty yet stylish, perhaps to provide a contrast towards angst-ridden literary vampires which were previously popular. Snipes participates in intense action sequences concentrating on the same stoicism viewers would expect of an reality-based superhero, slacking to offer witty profanity-laced one-liners. Combined with X-Men and Spider-Man, Blade was the primary superheroes arrive at the top screen. The 1989 "Batman" film features Michael Keaton as the Caped Crusader in one among his most widely used adaptations. Although Christian Bale's performance in "The Dark Knight Trilogy" is widely praised, many viewers criticized the gravelly voice Bale uses when playing Batman, claiming commemorate it harder to consider him seriously. Keaton plays Batman more suavely, striking a blend between dark, serious Bale as well as lighthearted Adam West on the 1960s movies. In a nutshell, Keaton plays the role of Batman naturally in lieu of as being a deliberately adopted persona.

Source : https://www.tampabay.com/opinion/columns/column-dont-let-politicians-stop-amendment-4s-clear-intent-20190318/

Finally, among the best superhero movie performances in recent history goes to the villain: the Joker in "The Dark Knight." Heath Ledger's take within the iconic Batman villain brings the Joker's menace, macabre humor, and fascination with chaos within a package that is advisable illustrated inside chilling "magic trick" scene where he gouges out a mobster's eye that has a pencil. The Joker discovers as perpetually full of nervous energy and near violence. Small mannerisms just like constantly licking his lips and nervously exploring, combined with menacing voice Ledger developed, makes Joker among Batman fans'favorites. These actors by no means provide the one five types of nuanced acting in superhero films. "Captain America: The First Avenger" has Chris Evans as a clumsy but well-meaning superhero, "Spider-Man" has Toby MacGuire portraying essentially the most well-known adaptation of Peter Parker, and "Iron Man" has got the snarky and suave Tony Stark played by Robert Downey Jr. While comic strip films might appear to be shallow entertainment, actors can play the roles good enough in making audiences suspend their disbelief.

759
Column: Don’t Let Politicians Stop Amendment 4’s Clear Intent

Source:CBS Philly

Column: Don’t Let Politicians Stop Amendment 4’s Clear Intent

Column: Don’t Let Politicians Stop Amendment 4’s Clear Intent

Source:Deadspin

Column: Don’t Let Politicians Stop Amendment 4’s Clear Intent

Column: Don’t Let Politicians Stop Amendment 4’s Clear Intent

Source:The Verge

Column: Don’t Let Politicians Stop Amendment 4’s Clear Intent